• 0 Posts
  • 103 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2024

help-circle







  • I think the author’s perspective is the solution should aim towards the social organisation of workers (in this case artists) as a group as a step towards the worker’s state; the technology is not the problem but the privatisation of the surplus value from socialised labour is. Art-luddites (if such a thing is even possible now) would actually be a good thing - they could threaten “machinary” to gain leverage for workers at large.

    It is not your personal failure for you attempting to survive in a system that exploits you and your labour, neither is a recognition of any classes that we fit in that is not exclusively proleteriat. As invididuals maybe our only realistic solution be attempts towards becoming petty-bourgoisie - if not already there - but as an organisation your scope is much much more.

    We have to remember when we are reading more radical writing that they are trying to push where we could be as a society ie the opposite of tailism. However, we should always place those ideas in the context of our own realities and trial them where appropriate, and learn on the feedback from this process - that is the more scientific and dialectic approach.







  • These developments look increasingly structural. The authorities’ stance since 2020, including regulatory tightening and zero-COVID lockdowns, appear to have inflicted long-lasting damage to China’s private economy, the dynamism of which was a defining feature of its economic miracle in the past four decades. Nearly 20 months into China’s COVID reopening, the private sector has yet to bounce back, despite many pro-private business utterances and gestures from China’s leadership. In sum, the findings here corroborate the view that China continues to suffer from “economic long COVID.”

    I wonder how the “pro-private business” countries are doing and whether there are any other markers of a healthy political economy that might not be the profits or revenue of the private sector.




  • His channel has excellent insights and well put together. Short, easily digestable, well cited and nicely presented along with often beautiful drone photgraphy of China at the end.

    He is a business analyst who sees through the western media smoke screen, the destructiveness of the western military indsutrial complex, the gains China has made, and the sophistication on how China develops out of poverty and builds out diplomacy. He clearly either lives in China or visits often and has first hand experience.

    However, he is an excellent example of how deep Western delusion runs.

    Despite all of this, what is the reason he believes China is winning? Christianity. And though he doesn’t understand it the language he uses to explain the trade diplomacy alludes to imperialism (remember he does not have marxist understanding of capital). It is almost as if it is from another channel. It is amazing that China’s strategy can even win loyalty from these kinds of people. The video in question:

    https://youtu.be/7-WA64ecsgM