• 0 Posts
  • 87 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 26th, 2024

help-circle


  • I have not bought a single blåhaj from Ikea but I have hand-sewn and gifted away multiple ones, since they are a fun piece of queer culture and some of my friends love them.

    You’d be surprised how much of pop-culture has historically been shaped by advertisement and marketing campaigns. Feel free to completely boycott these trends, be aware however that this level of ideological purism is at best ineffectual, and at worst highly isolating.

    I for one like having fun at times and it has not changed my opinion on the necessity of abolishing capitalism in the slightest. I’m sorry for your cynicism.


  • You can apply this argument to basically any non “piss poor hobby artist makes this in freetime” piece of culture.

    Of course blåhaj is a commodity produced by a large corporation. And almost any sufficieny large corporation will employ anti-union tactics. This is not surprising at all since it’s a necessity for corporations to act like this under capitalism.

    I still like blåhaj because it brings some of my friends joy. That’s all.





  • Some natives to the Americas completely wiped trees from their area

    A counterexample only falsifies universally quantified statements, not existentially quantified statements. My point was that there are historical and present examples of humans living in relative harmony with their environment so it is not a necessity, that we destroy the environment as humanity per se.

    Are you arguing there has never been a form of civilisation/community that didn’t destroy their environment or are you arguing they are so few and far between that we should consider them anomalies to the supposed human nature of destroying the environment?

    The former is a nigh indefensible claim the latter is somewhat easier to defend but would still require more than an example to be convincing.