Reminds me of a Simpsons joke:

Lisa: I’m studying for the math fair. If I win, I’ll bring home a brand new protractor.

Homer: Too bad we don’t live on a farm.

Isn’t that backwards? The liver filters alcohol out of the body. I would think an upgraded liver would sober you up quicker.

Great Again depression

Well how do you cook ravioli? In your fettuccine bowl?

Something similar happened with NHL player Jaromir Jagr. An 18 year old woman threatened to publish photos of herself in bed with him if he didn’t pay. His response was that he doesn’t care.

https://thehockeynews.com/news/jaromir-jagr-blackmailed-with-photo-could-not-care-less-about-it

Reminds me of Outer Wilds. Excellent game.

A friend of mine once downloaded something malicious to his Linux machine and wasn’t worried about it. Then some time later, while browsing his files from a Windows machine, saw it and was like, “hey, what’s this?” Oops.

He’s a tech savvy guy, so I’m guessing the fact he had downloaded it himself really let his guard down.

I wish Boost understood the collapsible spoilers.

On my client, it’s all expanded and I see all the formatting characters. It looks/works great in a browser though.

Add a model rocket and call it a missiletoaster.

Reminds me of Piss Christ.

For those who don’t know, this is Philomena Cunk, a mockumentary reporter.

Nice doggie!

Yup! Just last week it was revealed that they would be doing their adaptive suspension that way: https://www.motortrend.com/news/bmw-adaptive-suspension-connected-drive-subscription/

Years ago, a pedophile posted photos online with his face swirled, but police were able to unswirl it:

https://www.minnpost.com/politics-policy/2007/11/you-can-swirl-you-cant-hide/

I have no idea who the guy in this photo is.

Speaking of palindromes, fun fact: “()()” is NOT a palindrome, but “())(” is.

The first one is like ABAB, the second is like ABBA.

An example I found: the string of digits 0123456789 occurs at position 17387594880. In this case, it took 11 digits to describe where to find a 10-digit number.

So I think such an algorithm would technically work, but your “start digit” would be so large it would use more data than just sending the raw file data. Not to mention the impossible amount of computing power needed.

I did this, and it was great at first. Then I needed more socks, so I bought another batch. Then I had a mix of worn socks and brand new socks. They might look the same at first, but if you take a closer look, the older ones are a little lighter in color and the texture isn’t the same. I later bought a third batch. So now I have a mix of new, old, and really old socks. It actually takes more effort to match socks now than when I had many different socks.

I see this advice posted all the time, so I guess most people don’t care if their socks on each foot are a different level of worn, but it bothers me.

I looked into litter box robots and decided to try a low-tech solution first. I got an Arm & Hammer sifting litter box for under $20.

Basically, you dump the whole litter box into an equal sized sifter, then lift the sifter and give it a little shake, then dump the waste.

I can completely clean each litter box in 10-15 seconds. It’s not fully automatic, but I have no need for a robot anymore.

You time traveled to the Middle Ages to avoid cars? That’s dedication!

Lol, I remember eMachines!