Unfortunately the leaks have consistently shown a camera bump that looks like that and Pixel phones usually leak like 6 months before release so it’s probably real :(
Unfortunately the leaks have consistently shown a camera bump that looks like that and Pixel phones usually leak like 6 months before release so it’s probably real :(
Hate to break it to you but people born in 2006 are turning 18 this year (and are technically considered “adults”).
My point wasn’t that FAANG isn’t exploitative (my bad if it came off that way, I didn’t mean for that), it’s that everywhere else is also exploitative to some degree (most probably less so than FAANG, there are definitely a few that are worse though), and that it could still be reasonable to work there for some people.
The other consideration is that pretty much every company you could work for as a software developer is going to try to take advantage of your work. Most companies are morally bad at best and morally terrible at worst. If you discourage any good person from working there, the problem will only snowball from there.
If working at FAANG gives you the resources to support things you’re passionate about, and you’re willing to stand up for your values when they do something bad, there isn’t a problem with that IMO.
Github contribution graphs (basically how much code you committed over time)
*Unfortunately this graph is from Google images, not my account :(
Edit: maybe I should have included a screenshot of light mode because it looks closer to the shower panels, oh well
Another interesting low-level interpreter/emulated system to look into for anyone else trying to get started with this type of thing is the CHIP-8! It’s a pretty basic 8/16-bit instruction set (there are 35 opcodes, the instructions themselves are mostly simple) and there are tons of detailed guides on making one and writing roms for them.
This already exists to some degree, the Raspberry Pi 5 has 2 exposed pcie lanes and people have been (kind of hackily, since some parts of the driver depend on x86) getting AMD cards to run with the pi.
I’m not an expert on drivers so I don’t know entirely how close fully functioning GPU support is but in theory there’s nothing stopping that from happening eventually.
As far as I’m aware specifications/implementations that have been on PCs for ages like UEFI and PCIE are not architecture specific, but it’s just that a significant amount of code needs to be rewritten since it’s low-level enough that the CPU architecture makes a difference.
(If someone is more knowledgeable on this, please correct me because this is all just my understanding and I could be wrong)
Could also be referring to something like ~/.local/bin, where you remove unnecessary user-only programs vs. /use/bin where you remove system essential ones.
Is that definition not supporting your points though? It defines gender as mostly a social construct, which imo reinforces the fact that it’s made up and not a tangible thing anyway.
Sometimes biological sex matters (e.g. as medical info for a doctor to understand) but other than that it’s connected to gender in name only, based on made-up social rules.
To be fair, studying computer science isn’t always indicative of knowing your way around tech anymore. I’m an undergrad in CS right now with some experience as a TA. The amount of people who got points off of submissions (for a 2nd year class) because they didn’t know how to zip a folder correctly and submitted an empty zip file is honestly depressing.
That being said, even knowing what Linux is probably puts your tech literacy above most people so I doubt that was the case here.
See now we’ve got a valid argument going
Wasn’t the name “soccer” originally from England?
Edit: it was, and it was used for ~100 years in England until around 1960 - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_for_association_football
Ok but like let’s be real who actually fights with their wolves instead of just leaving them sitting in their base somewhere. Can the armor be dyed? That might help a bit
Another funny concept
If I understand this right, is the idea something like this?
Developers using FOSS libraries (even if their code is not necessarily FOSS itself), along with the end users of those products, don’t have to pay for it in any way. Because of that, it’s an “external cost” that no one thinks about even though most projects do need some kind of funding?