There’s a lot of dialogue about how the Liberal could salvage the upcoming election but everything I’ve seen looks like they’re just going to take a break and do a round of sitting on corporate boards. Then in 2029 they’ll see what they can get away after people get 4 years of atrocious governing.
The money won’t start flowing until 2026 –– after the next federal election. None of it is going to cover day-to-day operations, which observers note is the major gap transit systems are dealing with right now.
It’s pretty much the same the Housing strategy, really just sets up a timeline where it looks like a political maneuver to get the Conservatives to retract of this spending that would make people lives better while not doing much while they have the power to do so.
Most people would just say CBC should be run differently, but everyone familiar with the Conservatives know they really just itching to do a fire sale for all crown properties.
If anyone was wondering Danielle was essentially copying pasting a milder version of what Marjorie Taylor Greene said.
The Georgia Republican congresswoman baselessly alleged there’s a conspiracy afoot, insisting “Democrats wanted this to happen” and have “wanted Trump gone for years and they’re prepared to do anything to make that happen.”
After attacking Democrats for repeatedly calling Trump a threat to democracy, she soon blasted the party with more extreme rhetoric, calling the country’s polarized politics a “battle.”
“We are in a battle between GOOD and EVIL,” she wrote on X on Sunday.
“The Democrats are the party of pedophiles, murdering the innocent unborn, violence, and bloody, meaningless, endless wars.
In case anyone needs a recap:
Presidential candidate calling for people to second amendment their politics into reality for almost a decade. Someone took them up on that suggestion.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith — who once told former Fox News personality Tucker Carlson she wished he would put a federal cabinet minister in his “crosshairs” — called on “progressive” politicians to temper their language Monday after former U.S. president Donald Trump survived an assassination attempt.
I don’t think there’s enough time for the Liberals to seperate themselves from Trudeau at this point. If that was the direction they were going they should have done it a year ago.
I think twelve years later it pretty agreeable that compensation alone is not what stopping Canadians from having decent MP’s and in itself there’s a lot of sitting MP’s that’s probably not even worth minimum wage.
Fun chart I made:
Source data
Median Income: Income of individuals by age group, sex and income source, Canada, provinces and selected census metropolitan areas
MP Compensation: Indemnities, Salaries and Allowances
109 second video from 2012. This is going to be a rather long summary for a short video,
I’m not talking about overall atheism rates. More so extremely overtly religious people seem to be on the rise where as the same people used to be a bit toned down.
I have noticed people becoming more religious in the last year or so.
I don’t think the Liberal are willing to sacrifice their entire future as the one of the two alternating parties in order to gain a few more seats.
338 on a federal level projects them for 67 seats and 24% ± 3% on the popular vote. That translates to 85-91 seats which is a decent gain.
However this would mean the Liberal will likely never get anything close to majority again. I would also believe they would slowly dwindle in popularity with a rise of smaller parties. That’s a lot give up for 24 more seats for 4 years.
It’s plausible that Trudeau could want to push through voting reform as one last move to salvage something since him losing the next election likely spells the end of his political career.
The problem is the Liberals as a whole. It pretty predictable Conservatives are going to do a horrible job and by the 2029ish election the tables will be flipped and Liberal will only need to campaign on not being a disaster of a party like the incumbents.
The ballot seemed like it was setup for failure although the turnout(42.2%) was also mediocre as usual.
-
Theoretically yes but it also encompasses a number of different design changes.
These are his videos talking about it:
How Breaking Rules Could Create Better Apartments - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=011TOfugais
Why North America Can’t Build Nice Apartments (because of one rule) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRdwXQb7CfM
I’m always look forward to Uytae’s videos but since his last few topics seems to have driven legislative changes I really wonder what he’ll tackle next.
For anyone out of the loop: https://youtube.com/@abouthere
I saw a quite a few comments about how NDP and Green voters were somehow the bad guys in the by election but the Liberals seem more than happy to let the Conservatives run Canada into the ground for 4 years and somehow they’ve done a “good job”.
This is a embarrassing level of reading comprehension.
Housing, lying about voting reform, immigrations, 34 Billion dollar pipeline.
The senate should be elected.
How is this:
The Liberals did some good stuff. They could have done a ton more. But their changes have generally been baby steps in the right direction.
The same as this:
Liberals have done a good job governing, passing many laws and policies I support and generally making my life better.
How is it even a discussion that the Liberals did a “good” job. Can anyone actually provide anything tangible for this?
I want to be clear this isn’t in any shape or form a complement to the Liberals.
Pure GDP outlooks isn’t necessarily going to be tied to higher quality of life for Canadian especially given why it’s growing, but this should show how far gone most Conservative dialogue for policies is.