• 1 Post
  • 466 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2023

help-circle





  • I reckon that is one of the reasons. Lemmy’s (and the entire ActivityPub/Fediverse ecosystem/graph) attracts people with a positive, progressive attitude.

    Advertising is based on passive attitude and thrives on negative attitudes.

    There was a lot of negative being accepted (and sometimes actively pushed) on some instances, but most other instances defederated from them.










  • Time for an anecdote. When Holden were designing the HQ, there was a design paradigm called “Passive Safety”.

    The reasoning was that if the driver did not feel safe driving at speed, they would drive more slowly, and therefore be safer.

    That is why the HQ had narrow A-Pillars that were unfortunately in the wrong position to observe cross traffic and a suspension geometry that caused terminal understeer.

    As terrible as this paradigm was (they reworked the geometry for the HZ) it was vindicated in the 1990s when inexperienced and unskilled Subaru WRX drivers felt so confident in their handling that they would push beyond the capabilities of their vehicles.

    I still believe that deliberately engineered flaws are a terrible idea, but I can tell you that I am ultra careful and ultra aware of the traffic in my tiny little Jimny with bad driver crash ratings and live axles front and rear.



  • ANCAP guidelines are pushing for larger and larger vehicles.

    Crumple Zones, and pedestrian protection add significantly to the size and weight of a vehicles, and negatively impact driver awareness.

    Driver Assistance is OK to provide an extra level of protection, but result in complacency.

    A compact vehicle with good visibility and visceral road awareness will be less destructive on the roads than an oversized SUV with a driver ignoring all the ADAS technology blithely unaware of their surroundings.

    That said, a compact vehicle with unobtrusive ADAS would be even safer.



  • The reason is that there is profit to be made by inefficiency.

    When rail is used, the people who profit are;

    • the sender
    • the recipient
    • the railway company
    • the train drivers
    • the community.

    When Trucks are used, the people who profit are;

    • the petrochemical companies
    • politicians who receive contributions from Petrochemical companies
    • vehicle manufacturers
    • vehicle maintenance providers
    • vehicle parts providers
    • the trucking company
    • politicians who receive contributions from trucking magnates.
    • road maintenance and construction companies.
    • politicians who receive contributions from the construction industry.

    These are all at the expense of;

    • the sender
    • the recipient
    • the community
    • other road users
    • emergency services
    • the poor truck driver who is high-as-kite on amphetamine in order to meet his outrageous deadline.