I am sure you can provide sufficiently strong evidence to shoulder your burden of proof? Because the US, the state with the most extensive espionage systems and dozens of secret services could not.

If you claim China is commiting genocide provide the evidence. You made the claim, you have to provide the evidence, that is how ther burden of proof works. Said evidence must withstand scrutiny, of course. Anyone can make up official looking bullshit.

China isn’t crappy tho.

You information is about 10 years out of date.

The nine dash line is open to negotiations as recent ones with Vietnam have shown. “Taiwan”, actually called the Republic of China, is the rump state of the losing side of the chinese civil war. It only exists because the US interfered. It considers itself China, the PRC considers it China. Only you ignorant people don’t. It is a wholy internal matter of the chinese people.

There is not state called “Taiwan”, get it already.

“beer” - you mean the piss they call that way?

Tankies proven right once again, weird how this always happens.

Ceasefire of the korean War getting signed.

Weapon grade chad energy on the DPRK’s side, shortage of copium on the cracker side.

Or they pretend to be tubling oafs to create situations where they have to “regretfully” personally intervene, leading to maximum destruction around the world. The US will propably disintegrate soon after, but the territory of the former US will still be best off, resulting to a sucessor state having the best base for hegemony.

In short: The US nuclear doctrine.

To keep Chaebolistan around.

I can hear him calling me smoothskin.

The yacht story was blatant bullshit, the pipeline is at a depth where the divers need to stay in a pressure chamber after their dive. Because otherwise they’d fucking die. Such a chamber is larger than the yacht shown to the public.

“anti-revisionist” marxists are the most revisionist mf’ers out there. Can’t revision any harder than by throwing materialism out of the window.

Considering how Russia is:

1. clearly winning
2. Having about 1/10 of the losses of Ukraine

I assume that you do not know what you’re talking about.

The ol’ silk road gang is almost back together!

Considering that both my grandfathers had to serve in the Wehrmacht, I sure as fuck hope it’s not their NATO.

Tbf Russia only aimed at military installations and only escalated towards infrastructure after one year of fighting when Ukraine started doing terror attacks. Liberal media assumes Ukraine would use deep strikes as is western military doctrine - killing as many civilians as possible.

Well, for Kiev there’s the front to the east in Donbas and to the north in Kursk and other areas. Western news get their information purely from Kiev, thus they adopt the terminology.

“So who won?”

Don’t lie, Istn’treals self esteem was seriously injured.

Notice that this only only covers identified bodies which reached a hospital. The zionist entity destroyed most hospitals…

Blown to unidentifiable bits? Not part of ther number. Starved to death somewhere and the body left there or burried? Not in the number. Died of sickness and burried in place? Not in the number. Dead under the rubble? Not in the number.

Lancet estimated 180.000 a few months ago. Not unlikely that this estimation can be set closer to 200.000 now.