Only science needs sources. Maths doesn’t
Only science needs sources. Maths doesn’t
The “source” is internally consistent statistical reasoning and moral philosophy. When explained well enough, it should obviously be true.
Explaining it properly is easier said than done, though.
Brittle Bones Nicky is how the AI normally acts.
Don’t comply with tyrants.
All the jokes in the book are about arguing with animals so they set you free instead of killing you. I should have probably said that, to be fair. It’s about being in harmony with nature, as described by the introduction.
Not sure what kind of link you expect… the book is quite obscure and I don’t think anyone has done this kind of analysis on it. I don’t wanna add a link to buy the book or a link to a pirate copy, for kinda obvious reasons.
Then nanobots bring them back…
Most people only know Newton’s laws and don’t know that they are merely approximations of quantum mechanics and relativity, which behave far more flexibly and interestingly.
Politics is similar. We need statistical analysis rather than absolutes.
Whether or not you’re religious, you can always have faith and hope for the future.
I think there are many comforting stories that can be great for your mental health. I grew up watching Red Dwarf, and that made me always excited about what could happen in the distant future.
It already is. It’s basically science. These ideas can all be tested by militaries across the world
Can we not also combine this type of panel with the algae ones? I dunno how pointless that would be tbh.
Briar or meshtastic :). Internet should be back soon and better than ever imo
Eat loads of shit, think loads of shit
Never gonna give you up Never gonna let you down Never gonna run around And desert you.
Never gonna make you cry Never gonna say goodbye Never gonna tell a liiiiie And hurt you
We’ve known each other… for so long…