Is this really your point or are you being sarcastic? Pick one

I’m sorry my comment is not deep enough to be his irrelevant to the topic but I gotta ask: Do you know a text editor which is just notepad but remembers the last session when you close it? I just need a scratchpad, even notepad++ is too fancy for my needs but that’s what I was using on windows. Now I use kate but it feels like I’m killing a mosquito with a rocket launcher when a book cover would do.

Art cannot destroy my system. Bad code which might ask for elevated access can…

So I’m gonna execute the code of someone who doesn’t know the first thing about coding on my computer? Great!

I’d rather have AI art and human code.

I don’t like the tags (end of discussion). = No symptoms here

I don’t like the tags and I LITERALLY cannot wear anything man made unless the tags are cut = Symptom right here.

UN says (I’m paraphrasing because they are pussies) we don’t need any jobs apart from activist and policymaker until the world is in peace.

We already have surplus in everything and logistics isn’t even a problem because amazon proved that you can ship anywhere within one day if you are willing.

The only problem remaining is the law.

Until these are fixed, you are mentally masturbating when you say “my department is actually still finding out new stuff”. Dude the pipe is clogged and the engine is waterlogged, who cares you pump in new stuff?

ps: I’m one of these mental masturbators so no shade.

What is your sample size? Which places have you inhabited for more than 3 months? (Saw at least 2 seasons?)

I feel like unless you can make everything yourself, logistics would be a problem:

-Bring me Potassium Nitrate

• He is speaking in tongues, kill him!

Would you say alcohol ban for children has loopholes and those loopholes are exploited by children enough to warrant discussion? How authorative should it be, more than the alcohol ban or the framework we have is ok enough?

I don’t know, most concepts are only bad when the recipient is human. We do unimaginable things to bacteria but we(including me) don’t see those as atrocities. Murder is bad but sterilization(mass murder of a colony) of a medical tool is ok.

Eugenics(humans) = Currently everyone(I’m here.) but some cults agree that it’s bad.

Eugenics(animals) = We call it selective breeding/artificial selection and it’s a multimillion dollar industry, which is considered good.

Eugenics(plants) = We call it agriculture, the backbone of any civilization.

edit: Bottomline in case you misunderstand me again: Concepts are not inherently evil, how you use them makes them evil to some living beings (or all in some cases).

How can I make my text better so you see that I’m trying to show that concepts themselves are not evil and only how you use those concepts make them evil to some subset of living beings?

I thought making fun of incest was enough.

It is believed that bigotry was beneficial in very primitive humanoids: If you don’t know germ theory (or any biology tbh), bigotry helps against spread of diseases (while it might lead to incest… so you gotta balance it!)

Your immune system shows signs of heavy bigotry.

Evil is a category. Lion’s survival is “evil” to a gazelle while it is “good” to its offsprings.

Here we see a homo sapiens partaking in Whataboutism. He thinks bad stuff cancel each other out.

He also thinks unless you are a “VERY NICE AS A PERSON” master chef, you cannot critize food since what would you know, with your personality?

Men seeking men

Big beautiful woman

Bondage discipline sadism masochism

Wireless sensor network

Yes men, terraform more so the car-kin can live happily.

deleted by creator

I see this differently: Whenever I enter a new environment everyone immediately sees my potential and gives me better deals (not money, I’m trying to be as abstract as possible).

In other words, I scam everyone because people really care about projected potential. They give me stuff because of my potential which will never come.

Girls, internships, etc.

So no, the teacher didn’t see your potential. You scammed them with your adhd coping mechanisms.

Sounds like a constituion/lawmaker problem to me if he won/settled (i.e. paid to win).

It’s a weird ass language. When you start, it feels easy because rules are rigid. Then you try to build longer sentences PROPERLY and you feel that it is cumbersome. Finally you try to talk to native speakers, and you see that native speakers also think it is cumbersome and they omit 50% of rules in dailyspeak. Then, your brain turns into a mush which cannot decide if past is ok here or do I do perfekt to not look like a posh journalist. Do I use genitive like a properboi or dativ like a correct streetboi? Oh wait, they call it Cola (female) in Germany but Cola (male) in Austria? Wait what? it’s not country specific but much more local than that and you can be wrong while in a car?

It’s a mess.