In case you’re seriously asking, they vote based on how nice looking the head of the party is, not on policies. Democracy is dead when you see rednecks telling journalists they vote for the man because they like his tiktok channel.
In case you’re seriously asking, they vote based on how nice looking the head of the party is, not on policies. Democracy is dead when you see rednecks telling journalists they vote for the man because they like his tiktok channel.
Because it’s populist crap, obviously. We don’t need MBAs and business school grads to pay lower taxes, quite the opposite. There’s one party proposing to smoothen tax brackets across the board, which would also have a huge impact on the younger, and it’s not Bardella’s.
This tax cut is also a drop in the ocean compared to what they want to do to the retirement reform, but young people think they will never be old, and the old one sacrifices the youth at every turn so not many actually care this stuff despite the impact.
Lastly, I’m not sure there’s even a plan for financing such tax cut. That’s why people call it far right populist bullshit. The man did his entire campaign on tiktok and is only where he is because he married into the Le Pen family.
Première fois que j’entends ça tiens
Je sais qu’on est des gauchiasses ici, mais il y en a qui pensent vraiment que lfi et lepen sont comparables, alors tout rappel que les nazis sont pas très gentils peut rapporter des voix au NFP je pense
Glad to know people taking on 30 year long loans pay slightly lower taxes for a few years, that’s certainly helping a lot. Few because no one’s giving a 20 years old a loan for a house/flat lol so you’re probably closer to 30 when you actually can and do want to settle.
You might be financially literate, but you’re not human literate if you think this tax reform is anything but catering to the young and non-politicised.
Debt? What debt are you talking about? You know how taxes work?
We wouldn’t need to guess if these people interacted on such topics, but they don’t. Wonder why.
Horseshoe theory, the one where we call countries doing what we do communists to avoid facing our own failures?
Je suis pas fan du vote électronique, mais par exemple au Brésil ça a l’air de bien marcher, jusque là
La phrase sur le “truc dégueulasse dans les cheveux” est également un grand classique pour les noirs, John Oliver a fait un reportage là dessus il y a quelques années
In case you were not having a stroke: having money does not equate to being productive.
Linux is already a popular and viable desktop OS - for its target audience.
The downvote comes from you implying people cannot dev in Linux when its the platform of choice for this workload.
Now surely the user experience could be polished, but advanced users are at this point used to the workflow, and basic ones will stick to Windows out of inertia no matter what. Therefore the incentive for improving this kind of things is extremely low.
Ça existe depuis 2022 mais c’est la première élection qu’on a depuis. Pas fan non plus, après les français de l’étranger c’est que trois députés (c’est bien pour ça que le vote en ligne est autorisé). Ce qui me dérange plus c’est d’envoyer au gouvernement mon vote, sans anonymat.
I’m not advocating for half measures myself, but stating that half measures don’t work is simply historically false. You call for radical measures, bomb a bunch of official buildings, get some rights, and then go back to step one. But it never happens overnight, no matter how much we want it to
That’s exactly how most social movements, including slavery, evolved, but OK.
It’s funny because your article states the vehicles are fine. Good job on dropping a link you did not bother clicking yourself.
Exactly, if subsidies were actually invested properly countries might actually care about USA vehicles
I think the point is that the variable itself is an Option. Your example only works for literal Option (although the value inside the optional itself might not be a literal).
One option to OP’s problem is to use an auxiliary trait implemented on both string and Option<string>
What? How did you mix up everything like that?
If you don’t put down a rabid dog and get bitten, I’m not going to blame the dog.