No. If it’s everyone, then it’s everyone and at worst it’s not the most efficient way to communicate.

I would say, if you single out a group of people based on physical characteristics, then it gets weird.

But if it’s “The internet won’t start” vs “Every packet on port 433 is dropped even though no firewall rule is set”, then I think it’s reasonable to make some asumptions and adjust communication accordingly.

I work in IT and sometimes I have to explain something to a user who is somewhat tech-illiterate. Even developers may have significant blind spots when it comes to their OS or networking, for example.

So, if I notice it, I’ll change some terminology and I may explain instructions differently or use metaphors so every user understands what I’m saying.

And most coworkers do the same thing.

Here’s why I bring this up: For whatever reason, some colleagues give female coworkers the same treatment.

And that’s weird.

If someone is constantly treated like this, they should be allowed to rant about it on their blog. I’m fine with snark if it geht’s a point across.

Der Witz hat irgendwann mal mit Bergdeutschland angefangen. Somit ist’s aus historischen Gründen der Bodensee geworden.

Wurde nach der Einführung des 10€ Tickets von Furries besetzt, ist jetzt schwul und hat 100%ige Gigabit-Abdeckung.

Berliner Inseln > Sylt

Even worse; the Greens get blamed for shit the FDP does, because people don’t know how coalitions work.

This is a spin on a existing meme called “Thour”, where various animals or objects are licking a lemon.

Please refere to this link for references.

‘Bottom surgery’ bezeichnet eine Operation, bei welcher das Aussehen einer (transgender) Person angepasst wird; ‘bottom’ bezieht sich in dem Fall auf die untere Körperhälfte.

Die Antwort wäre also vermutlich:

“Because I wanted.”