![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/e5439a77-c20a-4f89-9e1e-74da191c94e9.jpeg)
I’m a knife guy myself but I have questions. Why two? And why is one in the same pocket as your phone?!
I’m a knife guy myself but I have questions. Why two? And why is one in the same pocket as your phone?!
Did you just expect people that call random devs at random times to actually read any information on a website?
“Everyone is wearing a mask” is papering over the fact that for some that mask weighs way heavier and does damage to their mental health. Masking ND is not the same as having to put on a nice face when you don’t actually feel like it.
Yeah they were experimenting with 64bit exploitation when this signal handler got some focus regarding a (likely related) deadlock so they rushed to disclose their findings to the project to minimise the possibility of having eyes on this vulnerability
Well building bombs on the other hand is very lucrative. As long as you keep a few zones of earth as playgrounds for these bombs
You just have a chain of unprovable assumptions there.
Kid’s use slang -> they must have picked it up on the internet -> many people are illiterate -> the parents of these specific kids are not raising them right
Excuse me the correct slang here would be to hit someone with that “hawk tuah”
You know what I never had a picture of a silly goose in my head. But now I do. Thanks!
Well I hope she’s afraid of them now.
If that was a real card I would have hated the font of that 23 so hard
I’m gonna start following and bothering you!
Edit: huh boost for lemmy doesn’t seem to have a “follow this user” button. So you might be save for now.
You have written tests for your code and now feel safe because your code is tested. But test quality is really hard to measure. The idea seems to be to introduce “vulnerabilities” (whatever that means…) and see if your tests catch them. If they do that’s supposed to show that the tests are good and vice versa.
As the first AI-based mutation testing tool, Mutahunter surpasses traditional “dumb” AST-based methods. Our AI-driven approach provides a full contextual understanding of the entire codebase,
This is where I call bullshit. The AST is a precise representation of the code which should be easier to analyse and modify instead of the raw text. If you only rely on processing the text I have a hard time believing your AI has a deep understanding of the contextual interdependencies of the different parts of the code.
Edit: it kinda does use the AST if one of the preconditions is a treesitter grammar? Maybe the marketing wording is just very unfortunate?
No that’s not the same. In one case there is only the theoretical possibility of help whereas in the other case there is a realizable possibility for help. This is a big difference.
But if a private company does it, it belongs ti the private company.
Unless you don’t believe in private ownership?
“If I invented the means of saving lives that doesn’t make it my responsibility to actually do so. Especially if there are profits on the line”. Wow.
Germany has a beautiful sentence in its constitution:
Eigentum verpflichtet. Sein Gebrauch soll zugleich dem Wohle der Allgemeinheit dienen.
Property implies responsibility. Its use shall also benefit the wellbeing of the general public.
The thought being that while private property is a core staple of our society this is only the case because the concept of private property is seen as beneficial overall. If private property starts hurting the general public then the implied responsibilities coming with the property are not being fulfilled and the concept loses its value to society as a whole.
I really don’t get what you’re trying to say here. That’s obviously great. I am all for doing this stuff, how could you even think I wouldn’t? I’m saying both kinds of activism provide value.
(Aside from the fact that nothing really got damaged…)
Part of your anger seems to stem from me saying that this whole thing isn’t moving forward fast enough and somehow you think that’s a critique of your personal work. I assure you that wasn’t my goal. But you have to admit that we are, globally, not moving fast enough.
The connection to the fight for racial equality is interesting but I’m not sure how well this applies. How do you suppose you can do anything equivalently “not accepting the rules we want to protest” in the context of climate change? Because before there was a big movement there were just a few people breaking the unfair rules. Which where likely talked similarly about as you are talking about these activists right now.
I’m only speculating that you made that situation up because deep down you understand the need to disassociate yourself from these protests, and it’s increasingly clear to me that you see their value in some kind of shell game strategy, where no one knows who’s pulling the strings. But again, you made that up, not me.
I am being very clear about the fact that two forms of activism can and should be done under different names. And that that is because some forms of activism that I deem valuable would have detrimental effects on the other form of activism if done under the same name. You seem to have a hard time getting that but that’s not because I’m being unclear about this.
Du hast aber nun mal behauptet es bevorteilt vor allem Geringverdienende. Es gibt übrigens mehrere Millionen Menschen die Arbeiten und trotzdem aufstocken müssen. Denen bringt das gar nichts.
Covetous demon inspiration finally revealed