The police are typically just there to point guns, so I’d only call if I thought a gun was useful, which is extremely rare.
e: I’m answering from the USA
I would absolutely change that stance if we took guns away from cops and stopped giving them military training. Especially if they had a social worker / deescalation force that was more likely to be sent.
I was expecting this to be a story of an issue, but this is actually really encouraging for what single payer could look like. The time scale isn’t great, but it’s pretty comparable to what I’ve experienced and heard about from friends here in the “efficient” private US system.
Here’s an ordered list of shows that came to mind, starting with what I think best fits with what you mentioned and getting further away from there, though I think they’re all worth it.
Mr robot
Fringe
The boys
Yellow jackets
Stranger things
The good place
Except Luffy is chaotic good
Be direct in communication when needed, otherwise just don’t.
Using a public bidet sounds like an awful idea.
Yeah, 50% person actually restarted, 30% chance person is lying, 20% chance person just turned the monitor off and back on.
Not like that
this is a response to the post title in reference to the image
Yeah that’s why I’m saying to vote down ballot. That will push back against the current trend more than either option for president.
The actions the democratic party has taken in the past few decades seem to be legitimizing the radicalization of the republican party that is inching the US towards a fascist state. You may be able to argue that’s not their intention, but that doesn’t change the results they’re achieving. Whether they keep the ratchet locked with desire or ineptitude doesn’t substantially change my argument.
Well the democrats seem to be either too weak or unwilling to release the lock on said ratchet, so take your pick. Either way we should still be trying to elect better people to the offices where we can actually make a difference.
You ever hear of the ratchet effect? It only works that way when the 2 controlling parties have similar goals.
Thanks for ignoring the second paragraph.
This doesn’t acknowledge the core of my argument. This doesn’t even contradict anything I’ve said.
That was pretty weird. You’re also misrepresenting my argument. As far as my motivations for posting, they are 1, get people to vote even if it’s not for president and 2, steer more conversation towards local politicians.
If we keep focusing solely on the president we’ll never get better options.
We still have snow sometimes that means there’s no global warming.
That’s included but not the only thing I’m talking about. Also the real point I’m trying to make is if we’re able to elect better people to congress and make those voices unignoreable, then it doesn’t matter who the president is.
My downvote wasn’t in anger. It’s more about the fact that this isn’t a news article which makes it questionably breaking the rules of this /c/. Combined with the headline being serious editorializing via broad generalization of what the statement is. Not saying it’s not true, just that it’s a unnecessarily sensational.