Ooh, stepped on a nerve here.
I mean, for what it’s worth, you’re absolutely right about my countries moral issues, and those are two major failings of the Canadian government. But I am not my country, and I hold my government accountable for that at every opportunity, so go fuck yourself.
But this isn’t about that, is it? Someone is trolling around here because we offended their favorite dictator, huh? Maybe don’t attach your ego to fascists and you won’t spend your time creating troll accounts to simp for authoritarian governments. Or does the leather of their boots just do it for you? I mean, I won’t kink shame, but if you’re going to ask to be stepped on, at least pick someone who respects human rights. They’ll actually listen when you use the safe word.






You know, I lied. I appreciate an honest response, particularly when coming from such a vitriol laced exchange.
I do still disagree to some capacity, and think that your take is a matter of muddying the methodology with the goal/results. The autocratic dictator with a strangle hold on the media, using their own version of the law to kill/jail their political opponents, is far more important to what makes a fascist than other elements. But there’s a genuine argument to be made that if I can’t be bothered to do a deeper read on the guy and the state of current day Venezula, maybe I shouldn’t throw around the F word so readily, so I’ll take that. I stand by the “the short description is pretty likely a fascist dictator,” but admit that, if we were to take a more serious, academic approach to it, I would absolutely be jumping the gun.
Regardless, I appreciate the de-escalation and genuine take on the subject. The snarky one liners and snap backs from both of us were disrespectful to both of us.