What an absolutely tremendous waste of your time. I love that about you. Thanks for teaching me about etymology of a 8th century settlement for almost no reason whatsoever.
What an absolutely tremendous waste of your time. I love that about you. Thanks for teaching me about etymology of a 8th century settlement for almost no reason whatsoever.
Nah. Downvotes should exist to show how unpopular radical or extremist views really are. It doesn’t apply here obviously, but I think the reason Meta and Twitter etc. are so negative/toxic is because you can’t discourage that content on popular posts. It just looks like there’s fewer likes.
Looks plenty fine to me. 🤷♂️
There’s no way it could ever offer anything to users.
I’m not so certain about that. I wouldn’t know the exact implementation or if it is possible/feasible, but couldn’t this 3rd party attester cut down targeted attacks to servers? (Like DDoS attacks or other server vulnerabilities).
Not AT ALL saying that the ends justify the means in this case. Google can fuck right off with any claim to security or privacy, but that’s my first thought to an actual benefit.
As I understand it, Lemmy does not have that capability yet and is one of the distinguishing factors between Lemmy and Kbin which allows mastodon account following. You can see mastodon content, just can’t follow. (I believe)
This is the exact same thing that brought them to where they are. I trust the direction of the company more now that they’re striking than I would if they had agreed to a temporary deal so they can kick the proverbial can down the road till some arbitrary future date.