• 0 Posts
  • 8 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle

  • EccTM@lemmy.mltoMastodon@lemmy.mlMastodon self hosting
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think with a self-hosted mastodon instance, the main downside is poorer discovery across the fediverse as a whole.

    When you scale up to the thousands of users something like mastodon.social has, it’s not really an issue because other users have already established connections between instances by following or replying… but if your instance only has a single user, you only see and share posts with the instances you’ve directly interacted with, and it can be really isolating. You have to already know what external accounts you want to follow, because your instance is initially blind to them.

    I feel like more instance connections leads to way larger amounts of data consumption too. I follow 120, and am followed by 12… my instance is currently using 24.1 GB for Media Storage.



  • What I feel would be acceptable:

    If you’re proud of your Framework laptop and want to brag about it, we’ll give you some swag for free that you can show off with when you’re out and about!

    What this looked like to me:

    If you’re attending a conference we’d be paid to attend, but can’t go to, will you show off your Framework laptop to attendees in an effort to convince them to buy one from us too, and we’ll send you some stickers?

    The issue isn’t even what they’re asking for, but how their asking it.


  • When I last had an everyday carry USB stick (5+ years ago) I found I never actually used it for anything.

    I had Ventoy and some practical ISOs, and PortableApps with a bunch of useful software (firefox, foobar2000, GIMP, notepad++…) for when I was using someone else’s Windows PC.

    …think I stored like two word documents on it, ever.




    • There are other submitted Merge Requests to that gnome-session GitLab repository that are 3 years old and are still open. This is only a proposal, and doesn’t actually mean it’s happening.
    • If GNOME developers want to focus on expanding Wayland support instead of maintaining X11 support, surely that’s their choice - they’re mostly volunteers anyway, shouldn’t they get to decide what they want to work on?
    • If other developers still want X11 support, they can branch these session targets and X11 support code off into a separate package and handle maintaining it.
    • X11 released in 1987. It had a great run.