Good, give them hell.

I suppose that for that kind of sensible news they prefer to have a rated source. Fake news campaigns are often launched from this kind of “looks credible but nobody knew about it previously” news websites.

deleted by creator

“What do you bring?” “Doom…”

If only a direct artillery hit was (still) that effective in WoT 😂.

Removed by mod

Funny since I’m rather pro palestinian, but let’s go with it.

I take into account that I don’t know a lot of things as I’m not some sort of omnipotent being.

Here is the data I got :

On the Hezbollah, as they don’t have an habit of documenting their bases (for obvious reason), all I know is that it was in a densely inhabited area, and reportedly underground.
So either it was built before this zone became densely populated, or it was built on a later date, knowing the area was densely inhabited.
Either way, it is either negligence, if they allowed the population to encroach on what should be considered a military area, or knowingly, to use the population as shield. Unfortunately they are against an army that don’t care about killing innocents, so that was of no use.

On the IDF side, according to Wikipedia, Camp Rabin is used as the IDF headquarters since 1948, at that time it was still an agricultural settlement in the periphery of Tel Aviv. This was seized from a Christian community, reportedly because they where nazi sympathizers, and they used to create the IDF HQ there.

If you take a look at it, you’d realize it is tall, and far from any habitation. And in a military base. If is was attacked, there would be little risks of civilian collateral damages. Sure, it is in central Tel Aviv on paper, but more because the city grew around it than because it was deliberately put there.

I couldn’t find anything about the Greek army HQ, care to provide a link?

For what reason do you think they’d build their HQ there and not far away from the population?

“Always two, there are. No more. No less. A Master and an apprentice.” - Master Yoda

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/

Seem to be an API hiccup.

Poor girl…

I’ve found that in the trash, was it yours?

“/s”

Too bad he won’t have to pay for his crime.

An unstoppable fuck colliding with an unmovable fuck.

Curses! Another library!

(Sorry, that piece of software name always make me chuckle.)

I hate to say that, but killing a unharmed, fleeing soldier is a war crime.

Well, according to ICRC website, fleeing is a reason for loss of protection, so no, this is a legit use of explosive. Did he attempt to surrender, he could have survived.

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/customary-ihl/v1/rule47#title-6

If it was the case, the chain is for sure confusing 😆

I don’t see any sign of such inference. He only said that Maori felt the need to create a symbolic figurehead to counter the threat that British colonialism did put on their culture.

I don’t know much on that topic, but I can confidently say that your answer is really far fetched.

That’s a good idea, but may not heal the lose right away. That sadness is the price to pay for all the love they gives us.