I think that should do it. I’ll try later today and report back.

Of course, this risks getting into an even worse state, because if the parent later tries to correctly wait for its child, the call will hang.

Edit: Will clean up the orphan/defunct process.

If the parent ever tried to wait, they would either get ECHILD if there are no children, or it would block until a child exited.

Will likely cause follow on issues - reaping someone elses children is generally frowned upon :D.

Zombie processes are already dead. They aren’t executing, the kernel is just keeping a reference to them so their parent process can check their return code (waitpid).

All processes becomes zombies briefly after they exit, just usually their parents wait on them correctly. If their parents exit without waiting on the child, then the child gets reparented to init, which will wait on it. If the parent stays alive, but doesn’t wait on the child, then it will remain zombied until the parent exits and triggers the reparenting.

Its not really Linux’s fault if processes don’t clean up their children correctly, and I’m 99% sure you can zombie a child on redox given its a POSIX OS.

Edit: https://gist.github.com/cameroncros/8ae3def101efc08be2cd69846d9dcc81 - Rust program to generate orphans.

Toughen up /s

I don’t hate all public cameras, I live in an area with lots of them, and most are fine enough.

This one in particular irks me because it doesn’t serve a purpose beyond voyeurism. It doesn’t cover the any of the persons property, or any entranceways to their property. Its only for monitoring people in the street. It might be technically a public places, and technically legal for anyone to record, but I really don’t think that makes it a good idea for everyone to just record everything.

I have seen kids running around naked in their front yard just down the road from this camera, so that also raises questions.

I’d prefer if surveillance of public places was left to law enforcement, at least there is a theoretically some form of oversight.

I have cameras. I told my neighbours about them and showed where they were pointed. I blacked out private areas when they were unintentionally picked up. No complaints.

I also walk past a camera that has been placed so that it only records the public footpath. Pisses me off, because its not protecting their house/property, just recording the public.

That’s impressive given we only have 26M people :/

I work in an office, but if I trip and fall 10km to the west, I’ll be right in the middle of the bay! Gonna wear speedos to work from now on to be safe.

I wasn’t afraid of drowning at work before, but now I am :D

In fairness, One Nation voters can’t read, so we can’t expect them to understand anything. And 60% is still a majority. But doesn’t feel good being down with UAE and Nigeria :(

Never heard that term, but its a very obscure concept, so wouldn’t surprise me if it had multiple names. Probably vender specific names?

Seems quite a few people havent heard of it, hence a lot of the split DNS answers :/

I can’t remember exactly what its called, but something like router NAT loopback is what you want. I’ll have a look around. But if you set it right, things should work properly. It might be a router setting.

Found it: https://community.tp-link.com/en/home/stories/detail/1726

Yeah, I looked into that, but I seem to be in the google play beta for bitwarden and nothing is broken? Looks like this is a different beta? Bizarre.

Is this a new breakage? I’ve been using vaultwarden + android for years now?

I am also Aussie, but I’ve been buying from Aliexpress of late. Maybe should try some Mirabella bulbs again, last time I bought them it was after the first OTA exploit was fixed, but before cloudcutter. Had to slice open the bulbs and flash via serial.

Are you just getting stuff from Costco?

Have they updated it for new stuff? Last time I tried it cloudcutter was patched in new stuff :(

I saw a 1.5hr video published a few hours ago, dunno if it got removed. Description did say it would be edited and reuploaded.

4 cores is a bit limiting, but definitely depends on the usage. I only have 1 VM on my NUC, everything else is docker.

I thought all the core processors had VT* extensions, I was using virtualization on my first gen i7. They are very old an inefficient now though.

Are you from Tuya? They seem hellbent on locking their stuff down to the cloud.

Perhaps point out to your management that IOT is an enthusiast driven market. If you appease the enthusiasts, they will recommend your products to their less technically inclined friends.

Enthusiasts want both: a good initial software ecosystem, and the option to break out of that if required. If your company can offer that, even if it involves voiding the warrenty, we’ll buy and recommend their stuff.

In the case of Tuya, their stuff was historically super easy to open, solder some jumpers and flash (or exploit the OTA to flash). I bought loads of their power boards and lights. In some ways I was an ideal consumer, I bought their stuff, voided the warrenty immediately (so no support calls), and never used their cloud, so didn’t waste their resources. Now they are making it near impossible, and I won’t touch their stuff.

All that said, good luck, your gonna need it.

I5 3470 is old, but its not that bad. Lots of people are homelabing on NUCs which are only very slightly faster. Performance per Watt will be terrible though. (I am on an i7-10710u, and I’ve yet to run out of steam so far - https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-10710U-vs-Intel-Core-i5-3470/m900004vs2771 )

It has VTx/VTd, so should be okay for proxmox, what makes you think it won’t work well?

You have a typo: platform: esphome.

Thanks for posting, good catch!