• AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ok but socdem. And before you try to make a counter argument with [insert nordic country that is actually capitalist] just think about how they always call the ussr and china communist while they arent.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Does it really matter what scheme the elites use to wring out all surplus value out of the population to repurpose for their own ends ?

    • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ok but socdem. And before you try to make a counter argument with [insert nordic country that is actually capitalist] just think about how they always call the ussr and china communist while they arent.

      What are you trying to say?

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ok but socdem. And before you try to make a counter argument with [insert nordic country that is actually capitalist]

      ??? That is a novel take “let us split power with our oppressors, but Nordic countries don’t do that”

      they always call the ussr and china communist while they arent.

      Yeah the USSR was and China is a transitionary socialist state lead by a communist party.

      Get it together people.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Ok but socdem

      Lol. Lmao, even.

      And before you try to make a counter argument with [insert nordic country that is actually capitalist] just think about how they always call the ussr and china communist while they arent.

      China is Socialist with Chinese Characteristics, and the USSR was Socialist. Both are/were Communist in ideology.