• toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s limited vocab to choose from & source available isn’t an appealing one

    • Ferk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yeah, it definitely is more appealing from a marketing perspective.

      I do understand why some projects might wanna use the term, it’s to their advantage to be associated with “open source” even if the source code itself has a proprietary license.

      The problem is that then it makes it harder / more confusing to check for actually openly licensed code, since then it’s not clear what term to use. Already “free software” can be confused with “free as in free beer”.