Why the Epic Games Store receive much dislike compared to Steam?

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wow, and I consider steam to be utter trash. It uses more resources than the games I want to play. A web browsing engine, in the software that’s the only way to launch the game you paid for, just to show bargain bin shit. But I’m not interested in that, I just want to have a place to shop, and then the ability to use the things I bought. I don’t want to drive to Walmart to play the music I bought, I don’t want my computer to load Walmart just so I can play a game. It’s crazy how bad Steam has become.

    • Yggnar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is a bad take in general, if your computer can’t handle running steam it probably can’t handle many games to begin with. It’s the least intrusive option presented so far in terms of DRM, and steam has done more for the Linux gaming market with Proton than any other company afaik. You have to launch steam to avoid games wanting to do things like denuvo or kernel level anti-cheat which is WAY worse, and those of us on Linux need steam running while we game for additional reasons. This complaint about not wanting to look at a storefront is just petty, especially when I’m pretty sure there are settings to open it directly to your library.

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you are using Steam, you likely have the resources for its overhead + Chromium.

      Believe it or not, Steam used to take longer to start, due to pre-loading shaders for Source games, but its been phased out.

    • frazorth@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What on earth games are you trying to play that are less resource intensive than the Steam Client?

      I have old laptops that can run it without seeing any impact.