what is the best linux terminal? I have been using alacritty for years and have been doing well. But I don’t think kitty and st. I was wondering if any new projects have come out in recent years.

    • Sbauer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Using ptyxis even on KDE, it’s neat. Very clean and some interesting integration with distrobox, definitely recommend.

  • highduc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Konsole is awesome and has great integration with Plasma ofc. I’m surprised to see it barely mentioned.

  • muhyb@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Depends on what you need actually. I was doing fine with urxvt on Xorg, so foot is a perfect alternative for me on Wayland.

  • okamiueru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Alacritty is fine. If you’re not combining it with tmux and zsh/fish, id pluck those fruits first.

  • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Am I the only one that’s fine with whatever the OS provides out of the box? Like, as long as I can turn the bell off and change the font, I’m chillin, and I have yet to run into a terminal that doesn’t provide those options.

    Curious to hear what drives people to seek out other options (besides tiling, that I understand, I’m a tabs guy myself tho)

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wen I first installed Linux I was like “I need the best fancy termanal” and wastes some time only not be satisfied with the results and installing tons of bloat. Now I always just use what I get by default from the distro I happen to be on 😂 I don’t even know what I want

    • BoxEbony@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      In my case it’s resource consumption, efficiency the impact with the windows manager I use, how much is keyboard controllable. It seems strange to me that a linux user uses the default applications. The beauty of linux is the huge variety and the ability to customize. If you use allova ready-made things, a mac or windows is fine too

      • Quintus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t know I never felt the need to customize the terminal. I just like what it comes with. It feels wrong to change that. Black background and colored text is fine. The rest of the OS though damn it’s like a fucking birthday party! Nothing’s at default ffs

        • BoxEbony@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          In the past I have found myself working with laptops with few resources and small screen (eeepc). Every pixel gained was a big win, and finding equivalent lightweight, high-performance applications could make all the difference. Eventually I found the optimal solution with i3 as windows manager and alacritty was the best terminal to use together (and zsh). Since then even though I have no real need I have continued to use this approach. And in the end being careful about pc resource consumption is also an ethical choice, if the pc consumes less power it is a gain for the environment.

      • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It seems strange to me that a linux user uses the default applications

        I sorta get what you’re saying, but rather than just pick any random distro and handpick every application myself, I put effort into finding a distro which has the most default apps that I’m happy with. I use KDE Neon because I like Dolphin, Konsole, Konqueror, and the pre-installed version of VLC; however, I DON’T use the default email client, text editor, etc.

    • ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Image display is an important feature for me. If konsole supported it, I’d just use that. If I’m on a gnome system I’ll pretty much always change the terminal because gnome terminal has a lot of issues with font rendering that I find annoying

    • hjjanger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Online trends I saw on the internet was the reason I hopped around multiple terminals. Use case for me it made no difference.

      There’s 4 other terminals I did enjoy using but xterm became my go to after I got tired of hopping around.

  • Andy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    For me: Wezterm. It does pretty much everything. I don’t think Alacritty/Kitty etc. offer anything over it for my usage, and the developer is a pleasure to engage with.

    Second place is Konsole – it does a lot, is easy to configure, and obviously integrates nicely with KDE apps.

    Honorable mention is Extraterm, which has been working on cool features for a long time, and is now Qt based.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      +1 for Wezterm, is also had image support that Alacritty didn’t have, which I needed for Yazi to work.

      I’ve heard good things about Warp too but Wezterm is where I’ll be for now.

    • med@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wanted to love it, but I keep getting crashes in mixed dpi environments on wayland.

      I moved to foot instead. Bare bones, but unobtrusive enough. Shame the scrollbar is jank.

  • DontTakeMySky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    A Windows VM running Windows terminal, SSH’d back into the host, obviously.

    Honestly I stick with whatever the default is and never had a problem that led me to find anything else.

  • aordogvan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Surprised nobody mentioned Yakuake. Just discovered it’s just for kde. Been using it for years. It hides at the top of my screen and slides down when the cursor hits the top. Full desktop when not used and can access it no matter which app I’m using.

  • thayerw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There is no one-size-fits-all, but for fits most, you’re looking at KDE’s Konsole or GNOME’s new Terminal (formerly Ptyxis). Everything else is going to be niche, with special use cases. What are your specific needs?

  • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Alacritty. Alacritty. Alacritty. And did I mention Alacritty? (I’m just counting how many I have open atm)

  • R...@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Running Kitty the past year and a bit and really like it. Used to run into weird laggy issues with other terminal emulators, but Kitty runs like a beast for me.

  • Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Foot because it’s sway default. It’s also configurable, has shortcuts and sixel support.

  • American_Jesus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    What’s wrong with kitty?

    I’ve been using kitty for some time didn’t had any issues, and multiplexing is useful.

    PS: i used tmux for many years, and still use on headless

    • EuCaue@lemmy.mlB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I personally don’t use Kitty because, for me, it’s much slower to open compared to Alacritty. :)