First of all because they did (facts).
Second of all, because they weren’t true communists and just established a dictatorship based on propagated communism.
First of all, they did not, they signed a non-aggression pact to bide their time while the West refused to ally against the Nazis, hoping that the Nazis and USSR destroyed each other.
Second of all, the Soviets were true Communists and established a Dictatorship of the Proletariat as is in line with Marxism.
Please read theory before you act like an expert in what is and isn’t “true” Communism.
Genuinely, what on Earth are you trying to say here? The other user was trying to say that the Soviets weren’t “true Communists,” which is wrong. It displays an utter lack of understanding what Socialism and Communism even are in the first place. Why speak so confidently on something they don’t know about?
Are you trying to say that the Soviets didn’t exist or something?
First of all because they did (facts). Second of all, because they weren’t true communists and just established a dictatorship based on propagated communism.
First of all, they did not, they signed a non-aggression pact to bide their time while the West refused to ally against the Nazis, hoping that the Nazis and USSR destroyed each other.
Second of all, the Soviets were true Communists and established a Dictatorship of the Proletariat as is in line with Marxism.
Please read theory before you act like an expert in what is and isn’t “true” Communism.
rEaD tHeOry!
Because that’s all it is, and that’s the only thing people like you have. Nothing real, only rEaD tHe tHeroRy!
dude would rather die than read a book… classic lib
Genuinely, what on Earth are you trying to say here? The other user was trying to say that the Soviets weren’t “true Communists,” which is wrong. It displays an utter lack of understanding what Socialism and Communism even are in the first place. Why speak so confidently on something they don’t know about?
Are you trying to say that the Soviets didn’t exist or something?
No. I’m obviously making fun of you and everyone else that responds to criticism with “read tHeOry”, as if that means anything.
Apparently you’re too daft to grasp that though.
“Read theory” means “learn what the words you are using actually mean so you can analyze historical events, movements, and structures accurately.”
Don’t be allergic to reading.
Lmao.
Whatever you say armchair communist
You should read sometime too, you might learn something.
ThE tHeOrY, right? Lmao
reading to a liberal is like garlic to a vampire
Imaginary history is like candy to you people
the only thing imaginary here is your historical knowledge