• linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    the communist in me yearns to blame capitalism for everything, and its sort of their fault but not directly, the actual reason that nutritional content is going down is because plants are growing faster and bigger while taking a similar amount of nutrients because there is more co2 in the air, its not really about business pressures or anything to do with specific decisions being made by corporations or farmers and the difference is irrelevant anyways (for now).

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      But it does boil down to business pressures. The business prefers more and bigger produce to more nutritional produce.

      Is that a bad thing? Maybe not. Maybe you can just eat more to get your nutrition since higher yield should reduce cost.

      But the point still stands that there is very little business pressure to make a nutritious product.

      • Jayjader@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        In my ideal world, the population would be sufficiently educated about nutrition in fruit and vegetables that picture-perfect tomatoes that are picked unripe so that they survive long distance hauling would simply never sell.

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Are you sure it’s not mostly a matter of soil depletion and synthetic fertilizers giving only what’s necessary to grow fast?

      • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        not as far as i know i could be mistaken, im no biologist of botanists but i did some research a while ago cuz its interesting and more co2 seems to be the agreed upon cause, plants in greenhouses with more co2 also have this “problem”.