• Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    0·
    2 months ago

    I mean the US constitution has lots of fancy stuff in it that I’m not sure I take to be so in reality. So I’d definitely prefer if we had some sort of confirmation.

    • ZeroHora@lemmy.mlPortuguês
      0·
      2 months ago

      So if we don’t have confirmation is not true? But the article on wikipedia without confirmation must be true because is on the internet?

      Why you doubt only what is not constructed in your mind?

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        0·
        2 months ago

        So if we don’t have confirmation is not true?

        No, it’s just unconfirmed

        But the article on wikipedia without confirmation must be true because is on the internet?

        The constitution was online too though.

        Why you doubt only what is not constructed in your mind?

        I don’t know what you mean, could you rephrase this one?

        • ZeroHora@lemmy.mlPortuguês
          0·
          2 months ago

          The constitution was online too though.

          Published by an american university.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            0·
            2 months ago

            I just meant that if I was believing/disbelieving stuff just because it was online then I would’ve treated them the same, since both were online