• oldGregg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The bottom picture isn’t accurate, I live on a reservation that isn’t listed.

    If there’s one mistake I notice immediately there’s definitely more.

    • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Additionally, most of Oklahoma is still various reservation lands. That was a recent court ruling, so I suspect this is a few years old.

    • BingoBangoBongo@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There’s a ton missing. The point still stands, but the bottom map is more like “places that are 70%+” indigenous people, rather than a comprehensive list. Is mislabeled to make a point, which is a stupid thing to do.

    • tugash@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      How’s the genocide of a whole continent “average history”? The magnitude of destruction in the Americas is not common and this downplay of a continent-wide genocide is annoying.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because there are other examples of continent wide genocide.

        Humans are the fucking worst and it isn’t unique to one area

        • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Other examples existing does not change that it is historically unprecedented and far from the norm. And its just a really strange and pointless thing to point.

          Person A: “my dad died in a car bomb” Person B: “ehh, average family death” A: “uhh what?” B: "well, there are other examples of people dying in car bombs, dude! "

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The root comment was “average history”. I replied to someone suggesting it wasnt, and disagreed with them.

            To use your analogy,

            "My dad died of old age.

            What? That’s insane no one dies of that.

            No, it’s pretty normal"

            • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re correcting me saying that expelling native populations time and time again from every land they go to, then genociding their entire population to the point of near extinction, using the most horrific methods and over centuries, is more akin to dying of old age than dying by a bomb?

              Please read that again and confirm to me that’s what you’re saying, because it sounds absolutely ridiculous. This scale and this horror are not common historical occurrence.

              • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s correct, humans have used the cutting edge methods to drive out and destroy native populations in the name of expansion, for thousands of years.

                I’m not celebrating it.

                • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I am sorry to restate this again, but the expulsion, genocide on the scale (both in size and horror) is historically unprecedented. You’re going to have to prove this to me if you think it’s a common occurrence instead of continuing to repeat it.

                  And for the record, no one here is talking about small scale expulsion. I am talking about expulsion AND genocide on the same scale and horror committed here. Show me that it is a common occurrence and I will concede.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hate to break it to you, but a meme, by definition, is political propaganda.

      Yes, all those images you’ve been laughing at these years were part of a political project. They looove hiding in plain sight.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        ah yes, the subliminal political message inherent in memes showing what my face looks like when i’m lying in bed and drop mh phone

      • GeekyNerdyNerd@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah yes the widespread political message that was “me and the boys out at 3am looking for beans”

        How could we possibly have missed those political overtones.

        Dude you must be on some extremely powerful drugs if you think all memes are political propaganda.

    • Chunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is probably the third meme in two days where the top comment says it’s not a meme.

  • Blapoo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    But you and I did NOT. I see a lot of people online who can’t make the distinction.

    EDIT: Thanks for replies, all. Some good conversation here

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    Ελληνικά
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Never forget? In some states it’s downright illegal to teach kids that complex, sophisticated and civilized societies existed here before white people showed up.