Substance_P@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 11 months agoCome and take itlemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square244linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkCome and take itlemmy.worldSubstance_P@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square244linkfedilink
minus-squarecurbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 months agoIn the context of the time period, it was a replacement for a standing army. As we have one, then obviously that amendment no longer has any meaning then? So we should just remove it. Cool.
minus-squareTb0n3@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 months agoI’m more for disbanding the standing military than disarming the citizenry.
minus-squareTb0n3@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 months agoBecause then we’ll get invaded by whoever wishes it and have to deal with whatever bullshit they push on us. Are you stupid?
In the context of the time period, it was a replacement for a standing army.
As we have one, then obviously that amendment no longer has any meaning then? So we should just remove it. Cool.
I’m more for disbanding the standing military than disarming the citizenry.
Why not both?
Because then we’ll get invaded by whoever wishes it and have to deal with whatever bullshit they push on us. Are you stupid?