• aleph@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Thanks, I’m aware, but that wasn’t my question.

    This new extension doesn’t seem to add support for app indicators… so what is it for?

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The current system tray/app indicator system is kind of a mess.

      It adds potential insecurities, and it’s just generally untidy and unintuitive - will the icons be monochrome or coloured? When you click it does it open the app? Does it open a context menu? Does instead right clicking open a context menu? For most people that stuff is minor, but the Gnome team seems to really hate little unintuitive or inconsistency niggles like that.

      They’ve spoken for years about wanting to create a new, standardised, cross-desktop system tray that fixes these issues.

      I don’t know if this specific thing is related (I can’t follow the link on my work PC), but if it is, it could be the first step towards the above.

    • Ardor von Heersburg@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Actual legacy tray icons. AppIndicator more or less allows an application to send an icon and a list of menu items to the desktop environment to be displayed there in some way. Classic tray icons, on the other hand, are actually part of the application that provides them, the system just puts them in a common row for all applications.

      While this type of tray icon is more flexible because applications can do anything they want there, AppIndicators are a better/safer solution because … well, applications just cannot mess around in the system tray as much.

      Personally, I thought the classic tray icons were as good as dead (on Linux), but I guess GNOME can always surprise. Not only in removing stuff but also in bringing it back.

      • aleph@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ah, that was the explanation that I was looking for. Much obliged.