A New York subway rider has accused a woman of breaking his Meta smart glasses. She was later hailed as a hero.
Some cashier at McDonalds will probably rat her out Luigi-style.
From her appearance, I highly doubt she consumes the shit from McDonald’s.
Not sure what you’re talking about; Luigi and I were playing cards that day. He was physically with me the entire time.
Love to see it.
Honest question,do you have a similar feeling when a person knocks the phone out of a person’s hand.I see no difference, if you are in public you should assume that you are being recorded.
I wish you were recording me so I could smack the phone out your hand
Do you work for Meta PR?
What’s the Difference Between AI Glasses and an iPhone? A Helpful Guide for Meta PR
Lol,fuck meta this ain’t about them, I find it bizare that people get upset that they are being recorded in public, and why being recorded with stupid fucking glasses is somehow worse, if someone wants to secretly record people there are much cheaper and more discreet options.
The story is literally about Meta glasses.
Is it? Story I read was about a lady assaulting a man on a train.
Why, though?
Honestly I’m almost certain that it is staged, but her side of the story isn’t stated. So we don’t know why.
🪬 🥇
Modern day luddite 💅
Remember the “old” saying that if the product is free, you’re the product? This is the end stage of that where unwilling and unknowing participants are now the product.
Also, anyone remember gargoyles from Snow Crash?
Now you’re the product even if your paid too
I even let her sit down when she got on the train at 42nd street, and I continued to stand.
Oh wow, everyone look at this chivalrous hero - he was standing when she got on the subway, and graciously “let” a random woman sit. It’s not like he gave up a seat for her, but he still thinks that by “continuing to stand” he somehow did something special that she should be grateful to him for.
I know seats can be a rare opportunity on the NYC subway, especially around 42nd St. But to think that by standing you’re somehow entitled to more respect than anyone else is absurd.
Funny how she was standing in the video he posted though. In a really pretty relaxed position too so it doesn’t look like she just got up.
Yeah I understand hating the Meta glasses, but what, are we going to destroy every camera we find in the wild? This is a small piece of a larger problem and I’m just not sure assaulting a stranger on the subway is the way to go about it.
When Google Glass was a thing people with assistive vision technologies were being attacked too.
I find it interesting that we only know of this because someone recorded the guy.
He recorded himself after the incident.
The video in the story is being filmed by a third party. But honestly I give the whole story a 52% chance of being completely staged.
Are you for real? Or just a Meta bot? Can’t you see the difference between a camera in a phone, that is more or less obvious when pointed to film a person, and a camera mounted in glasses? For real?
Or are you suggesting that if we have let phones with cameras be, we should tolerate another escalation in the fight against privacy?
Please let me know which is it?! Im really curious.
You’re missing the point entirely.
A phone in a breast pocket doesn’t look all that out of place, especially if the person has very tight jeans on, but it’s quite effective for filming.
To be clear, I’m not OP, and I’m not even necessarily saying you are wrong, but as with most things I think our energy is being pointed in the wrong direction. I care more about the governments and corporations with their ability to record and cross reference images and videos from basically everywhere much more than I care about an individuals ability to do so. Even our concerns with an individuals ability to do so are often a result of that individual’s ability to amplify the harmful aspects through the use of one of the aforementioned’s unchecked power.
If we aren’t afraid to fuck up some people wearing Meta glasses that are being dick heads, then let’s also not be afraid to fuck up the government and corpo forms of it as well.
How many flock cameras and ring cameras did she pass that day lol (has NYC banned them?)
are we going to destroy every camera we find in the wild
If it is from a mega corp that is known for spying on people: absolutely
They have no right for cameras in public.
They have no right for cameras in public.
I’m pretty sure they do. That comes along with the word “public”. This sounds like ICE telling observers to stop filming.
Collecting the footage from thousands of cameras and turning it into a giant surveillance system to track everyone is a different matter, and that’s what needs to be made illegal.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Every little bit helps! If we all pitch in, many hands make light work!
Very true, this is why we need people advocating for privacy law. I think those responding don’t understand I’m on their side, I’m just approaching it from a constructive point of view.
are we going to destroy every camera we find in the wild?
Yes.
Skibidi are the good guys?
I think there’s even an achievement for doing that.
That is so Project Mayhem.
I’m all for this but we should start with all of the cameras owned by businesses and the government. If anyone at all should be allowed to record in public it is we the people.
Humans are shittier, mobile cameras, so I agree. The planet needs a rest from humanity.
Yeah my first thought was “you know what? Now that you mention it, I’d be more than happy with that. I didn’t even think of it as an option but yeah, sure, let’s give it a go”
Start with your phone then.
If I could get a phone without one I would.
I don’t recall ever having used the damn thing, all it does is stick out like a wart making the phone unsightly and unnecessarily thick.
And the other, even more useless one is just poking an extremely irritating hole on the screen.
They’re probably scratched beyond any usability anyway, since for some reason cases and screen protectors refuse to cover them.
If you want a phone without camera, wifi or audio, just install Linux on it /s
really, the pinephones seem fine…oohh you mean the ones that dont allow others to be into the proprietary systems…yeah great burn.
The /s is sarcasm.
It’s the stereotype thing of Linux desktop 10 -15 years ago. I’m a Linux user for the past 25
I didnt ask for your unverifiable nerd card, I just stated what needed to be know about the state of linux on phones. I mean android is linux but with all the blobs that those companies require you not to tamper with. You could have mentioned other linux projects that are in the space as well, or even go after windows about how every update it resets all your audio for like a decade or more (dont even talk about plugging a monitor in or the power flickers then its all a mess). But you do you man.
That’s not “in the wild”. Your camera phone on the other hand…
The second you touch someone else’s you better believe they are going for yours.
If you think that someone else’s is in the wild, but yours isn’t, you are just a useless hypocrite.
Are you explaining yourself?
Being stuck inside a system does not make one a hypocrite to criticize it from within the system. Nor would one act of self immolation achieve anything but dying pointlessly in a fire. The prison guards will merely shovel your remains into a bucket. People like you will continue to goad other miserable prisoners into more pointless acts of self destruction for short term personal gratification.
We’re so deep into the technological surveillance state that people like you can’t even see that there was once a world outside these prison walls. You’ve accepted your fate. Maybe you we’re born into it. Maybe it’s been so long that you’ve forgotten it’s not normal to have all this forced upon us. In this world where surveillance state technology is required, smartphones are now integrated into critical needs of daily life. From government to financial institutions to workplace. You cannot live without it short of going inawoods Ted K style. At which point the prison guards are likely to descend upon your log cabin with the full military force of the state and corporate apparatus.
Ultimately these acts of immolation achieve nothing against the system itself but demonstrate the futility that we’re all stuck inside a prison. Seems like you thought you had a really clever retort there. You don’t. It’s you who are the fool.
If we normalize assaulting people that want to walk around with cameras on their face being creepy then less people will walk around doing that. Sometimes the solution is as simple as some minor violence.
are we going to destroy every camera we find in the wild?
Yes
Nah, she’d only be a hero if she smacked zuck in the face.
She is a hero
Lol.
Shut up nerd
Peak New York. Love to see it.
“eth8n” - Ethaten?
deleted by creator
Etheightn.
The Hero we need.
Oh no, god forbid someone records her in the most recorded state on earth.
like the google glass was used for porn as soon as it was released, and then shortly google stopped making them.
the entire internets life cycle has always been:
- new tech
- new porn delivery option
- widespread use of new tech
- profit
- repeat
To be fair,some of the earliest examples we have in all media is “porn”.
Meta tells the people that buy these glasses that they “only record audio and video when you tell them to” but that turned out to be an absolute lie. It’s always looking, always listening, and people shouldn’t use these fuckin corpo people trackers and advertisement machines.
Yes, it’s only acceptable for the state to monitor people in public.
@[email protected] @[email protected] listening, sure… just like all our phones and smart home speakers and watches tend to be these days… but what’s your evidence it is always looking? I don’t think that is currently the case but I certainly wouldn’t rule out them doing it in the future once it becomes less of an issue for the battery life of these.
