The optometrist recommended seamless bifocals. I have a very painful nerve condition in my face (atypical trigeminal neuralgia), so this is what I need with glasses: the lightest weight frames possible- known as ultra light- with the lightest weight lenses possible and automatically darkening lenses so I don’t need the weight of sunglasses. The cheapest frames brought the total to $250 on the site the insurance worked with.

The frames are $20 on the cheap site. Everything else in the cost is the lenses.

As for why I have to buy them online- I don’t want anyone touching my face unless it’s absolutely necessary. The exam was painful enough.

American for-profit healthcare is fucking awesome.

  • CherenkovBlue@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Expensive lenses are expensive. My glasses also cost about $350 after insurance covers them. I go for all the expensive lenses and digital lens tech because my prescription is quite strong and it improves quality of life, but my vision could be corrected with the basic stuff.

    Maybe your doctor can make the case to your insurance that these are medically necessary to be so lightweight. Otherwise, the improvements are a nicety, not a necessity.

      • VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I would say $250 is fairly cheap, in Scandinavia you can easily pay $1000+ for special lenses.

        For me the cheapest with okay quality costs $500 for a deal with two pairs from SpecSavers.

      • CherenkovBlue@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        You sound very entitled.

        Why are medical care/devices less expensive in other places, such as Europe? In large part because taxes are so high. US taxes are relatively low, meaning a different economic system and personal financial planning strategy.

        My spouse is from a European nation with high taxes. It’s not all roses there. There are pros and cons to each system.

        Also, see the other comment from a Scandinavian person. They seem to contradict your sentiment.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          My spouse is from a European nation with high taxes. It’s not all roses there. There are pros and cons to each system.

          Cool. I’m thousands of dollars in medical debt. The ‘cons’ I always hear are the long wait times. I’ve had to wait months to get procedures done here in the U.S.

          • CherenkovBlue@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            One of the cons is that even with the taxes and long wait times, you often still have to pay a lot.

            Besides, I gave a suggestion above about working with your doctor to make the case about medical necessity. Have you tried that?

            Edit: medical debt is also dischargeable through bankruptcy, which is not to be undertaken lightly, but may be something for you to consider.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              You sure don’t in Canada.

              And yes, my case is very medically necessary. Without going into details because plenty of people have heard them way too many times, I’m close to one year without eating any solid foods.

              That is on top of the neuralgia, which is mostly dealt with, but still requires me to see a neurologist. She can only see me twice a year. She’s also the only one in town.

              Oh, and we have supposedly good insurance.