When structural inefficiencies prevent successive governments from effectively maintaining public infrastructure: a star is born.
When structural inefficiencies prevent successive governments from effectively maintaining public infrastructure: a star is born.
A so they don’t build for the government, but more a public private partnership where the government contracts they to provide the service rather than to build the infrastructure, then the Simplicity company sells the service to cover costs and make the profit?
I think I’d prefer state owned, but this does seem like a good compromise compared to some overseas owned company. And I guess the government can’t sell them off to fund tax cuts.