• LostWon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wow. Moving someone to another location and then suddenly firing them for “communication standards?” Unless there’s some highly compelling evidence to indicate otherwise, it’s pretty clear cut what happened here. I guess they calculate it’s better to pay a fine for a wrongful dismissal than to have a supervisor that is sympathetic to workers.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      As a society, we should ensure everyone that goes through something like this ends up a millionaire who never has to work again.

      That’ll motivate workers to unionize more than anything else we could possibly do.

      • psvrh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Want to fix this? It’ll take a) jail time, and b) asset seizure.

        Corporate structure deliberate distributes responsibility for things like this such that:

        • It’s very hard to find one person to blame, let alone prove malfeasance.
        • If by some chance you do find a smoking gun, the fine for doing so is usually less than the profit of the transgression

        If, eg, Howard Schultz and his direct-reports faced fines and/or jail time directly, and those fines were orders of magnitude the harms of the action, then you’d see some of this stop.