Hello World, As many of you have probably noticed, there is a growing problem on the internet when it comes to undisclosed bias in both amateur and professional reporting. While not every outlet can be like the C-SPAN, or Reuters, we also believe that it’s impossible to remove the human element from the news, especially when it concerns, well, humans.

To this end, we’ve created a media bias bot, which we hope will keep everyone informed about WHO, not just the WHAT of posted articles. This bot uses Media Bias/Fact Check to add a simple reply to show bias. We feel this is especially important with the US Election coming up. The bot will also provide links to Ground.News, as well, which we feel is a great source to determine the WHOLE coverage of a given article and/or topic.

As always feedback is welcome, as this is a active project which we really hope will benefit the community.

Thanks!

FHF / LemmyWorld Admin team 💖

  • Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    41
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yes, everyone should always do all their own work every time. Trust nothing! Formula of gravity? Newton and Einstein might be liars, and all the science textbooks could be complicit. Do your own research. Conduct your own experiments. Is the Earth flat? Grab a sailboat and find out!

    /parody

    • thoro@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      You think this organization’s judgement is some objective algorithm and doesn’t contain its own subjective biases?

      • Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nearly everything has various types of subjective bias. This is not a good excuse to believe nothing when bias can simply be examined and taken into account.

        • Armok: God of Blood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          This is not a good excuse to believe nothing when bias can simply be examined and taken into account.

          By your own reasoning, the examination would have its own bias. This isn’t a mathematical operation with a right answer.

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            Correct. Mathematical certainty is an impossible standard, and seeking it in news reporting is an unrealistic and silly objective that results in nothing useful.