ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agoCivil rights is cookeddiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square105linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageCivil rights is cookeddiscuss.onlineByteOnBikes@discuss.online to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agomessage-square105linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareWanderingThoughts@europe.publinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoAnd the conclusion is that you need a system that allows multiple parties to get some competition going instead of winner takes all.
minus-squaredreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-22 months agowhich party is fighting for that at the national level? I don’t hear the sound of democrats falling over each other to start promoting more parties in govt. Not even going to consider the republicans.
minus-squareSaraTonin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoBetter yet, a system which requires co-operation between different parties
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoWe already have that. They’re all working together in the same buildings and serving the same disgustingly privileged people.
And the conclusion is that you need a system that allows multiple parties to get some competition going instead of winner takes all.
which party is fighting for that at the national level? I don’t hear the sound of democrats falling over each other to start promoting more parties in govt. Not even going to consider the republicans.
Better yet, a system which requires co-operation between different parties
We already have that. They’re all working together in the same buildings and serving the same disgustingly privileged people.