• Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    So children getting cancer? That’s clearly god’s will, and is therefore good.

    This answer to the Epicurean paradox is nothing but semantics. Let’s just rephrase the question:

    • Can god be all powerful, all knowing, and all loving by human standards?

    –> No. It creates a paradox. So, using human words and human concepts, god cannot possibly be all three things. Therefore, by human standards, we cannot expect love, omniscience, and omnipotence from him. That’s all the paradox proves.

    It’s not a “gotcha” to claim that there might be other standards, which are meaningless to us, but somehow mean something equivalent than the concepts we already have words for. Those foreign concepts have obviously nothing to do with what we humans call power, knowledge, and love. They don’t mean anything and there’s literally no way to fill them with meaning either, since they are by definition independent of human concepts.

    Claiming that god is something, but this something cannot be understood, is in all consequence an empty claim without any meaning. Easy to make, but at the end of the day says and proves nothing.