For some reason or another, Ada has a problem with Mind Traveler. Ada claimed Mind Traveler’s communities and posts were causing trouble, so Ada made a few demands of Mind Traveler, who followed through with those. While Mind Traveler stuck to the agreement, Ada went beyond that and banned Mind Traveler. Ada is keeping the drama going on while Mind Traveler is sticking to the rule book.
Mind Traveler and Liberty Hub are on good terms with one another. Mind Traveler was unbanned and made comments working towards collaboration. There’s no conflict there. Mind Traveler shut down their “controversial” Non Voters, just like Ada said. c/Soulism was a philosophy site not even related to mocking, so it was an even lesser non-issue.
If Ada had stuck to Ada’s word, everything would be fine.
If Ada had let people freely associate, everything would be perfectly fine.
Instead here they are stirring up a stink and trying to start some pissing contest when everything is literally fine. All this underhanded rigamarole on Ada’s part is disturbing to me.
So, there was a community called “non voters”, created by MindTraveller?
Ada locked it down for not confirming with the spirit of the instance (I’m going to shallowly read into the name of the community, and say that the lock seems fair, from the outside).
Then, it reads to me like MindTraveller made another community, which was also taken down, and got him banned along with it.
Why did those things happen? Why was a second community made? Why was it banned? Why are you claiming that it was an unfair ban?
Honestly, if those points aren’t clarified, Ada appears to be really reasonable from a bystander’s perspective.