• quixotic120@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      which means if you’re impacted after a ton of paperwork and emails you’ll get a check for $200 6 years from now to make up for the fact that your $650 processor was a lemon. justice served!

      • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sadly, this is the way. Good to see Intel giving AMD leg-up in the market though. Accidental MVPs are always interesting to see.

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Glad I chose an AMD setup for my last overhaul. Sympathies for those affected or left to completely redo their rigs to avoid intel.

    • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Literally just paid for the final part for my LGA1700 rig… saved up for months. Fuck this shit.

      I’m running my i5 13600h until the computer can’t turn on anymore. I’m not made of fucking money.

          • towerful@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Hopefully the microcode patches fix the issue before it has done any damage for you. Or if the issue has already done damage, hopefully you get a replacement

            • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Microcode patch doesn’t fix the oxidation problem that they all inherently have. I’ll be lucky if the the cpu lasts a couple months of minimal use.

              • towerful@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                My understanding was that the microcode was causing too much power draw which caused the oxidation.

                Tbh, I’ve read/heard lots of speculation, and I don’t exactly trust Intel to be telling the entire truth.

                • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  My understanding is that there are two issues. Manufacturing defects cause the copper to oxidize, and the processors themselves request more voltage than required or needed, causing excess oxidation damage. Intel said they cleared up the manufacturing defect issue sometime around October 2023

  • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    No offense, but Intel has been shit for a decade. Far too much power draw for marginal gains. Their whole schtick is terrible for the planet and comically anti-innovation. Why would anyone have an Intel processor? It’s totally irrational.

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      If Intel makes it right, it won’t.
      There might be something for enterprise level with loss-of-revenue or something.
      But if the microcode patches fix the issue, and they replace any already-damaged CPUs, then it’s clear Intel is doing what they can to fix it.
      Lawsuits aren’t for mistakes that get “made good”, unless it’s a contract breach