TheDwZ@lemmy.worldBanned to Australia@aussie.zoneEnglish · 1 month agoSome of Australia’s most influential thinktanks refuse to reveal their biggest donors. Should they?www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square4linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkSome of Australia’s most influential thinktanks refuse to reveal their biggest donors. Should they?www.theguardian.comTheDwZ@lemmy.worldBanned to Australia@aussie.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square4linkfedilink
minus-squareNo1@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 month agoAn execption to Betteridge’s law of headlines Yes, of course they should be disclosed. Could be domestic or foreign bad actors or terrorist organisations for all we know. But there will always be ways around it, eg put it few a few trusts or shell companies so that it’s not obvious who is really donating it.
An execption to Betteridge’s law of headlines
Yes, of course they should be disclosed. Could be domestic or foreign bad actors or terrorist organisations for all we know.
But there will always be ways around it, eg put it few a few trusts or shell companies so that it’s not obvious who is really donating it.