I think we need a city leadership with some real “vision” which is now a possibility for the first time in a long time with the new charter allowing better representation at the top level. Near the end of the article, they briefly mention the idea of the City purchasing the Fred Meyer building, which could be the start of a way out, but it would take drive, patience, and vision to actually come to a solution. I’m picturing some sort of redevelopment that takes advantage of the proximity to public transit.
I think the bad news is that there’s no simple solution to restoring Gateway, and the neighborhood is suffering from so many of the same problems we see elsewhere in the city. It’s going to take a lot more than shuffling tax dollars around and trying to “gentrify” the area to bring the city to a high standard of living.
I think we need a city leadership with some real “vision” which is now a possibility for the first time in a long time with the new charter allowing better representation at the top level. Near the end of the article, they briefly mention the idea of the City purchasing the Fred Meyer building, which could be the start of a way out, but it would take drive, patience, and vision to actually come to a solution. I’m picturing some sort of redevelopment that takes advantage of the proximity to public transit.
I think the bad news is that there’s no simple solution to restoring Gateway, and the neighborhood is suffering from so many of the same problems we see elsewhere in the city. It’s going to take a lot more than shuffling tax dollars around and trying to “gentrify” the area to bring the city to a high standard of living.