Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 3 months agoWhat's your thoughts on this?media.piefed.socialimagemessage-square96linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageWhat's your thoughts on this?media.piefed.socialEk-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square96linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareGerudo@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoEh, I can give a pass to this because even if it wasn’t this ad, another one would be in its place burning the same amount of energy.
minus-squareWomble@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoIf this university hadnt bought this meaningless advert it would have a tiny reduction in the demand for advertising potentially leading to less always lit billboards being made. So no, they dont get a pass for it.
minus-squareuno@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoWouldn’t it still be more useful to display an ad criticizing this kind of 24/7 lit ad?
Eh, I can give a pass to this because even if it wasn’t this ad, another one would be in its place burning the same amount of energy.
If this university hadnt bought this meaningless advert it would have a tiny reduction in the demand for advertising potentially leading to less always lit billboards being made. So no, they dont get a pass for it.
Wouldn’t it still be more useful to display an ad criticizing this kind of 24/7 lit ad?