• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I can see the utility in this.

    I have tens of thousands of photos, it’d be nice to search “[daughter’s name] holding blue teddy bear” and have it come back with the exact picture I have in mind but would struggle to find.

    Is it worth the privacy and potential security issues, though? I’d say hell no.

    I look forward to the future where we have powerful, energy efficient neural processing hardware, and a robust open source software ecosystem to do this in a more trustable way offline and on-device, or on a Nextcloud home server or something like that.

    • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t understand why Google is pushing cloud AI so much after pushing their Tensor AI chips for so long. iPhones have indexed pictures offline for years but Google insists on doing this tagging in the cloud.

      I have a copy of Photoprism running that does some (not great) indexing of my pictures, and that runs on half a CPU core on an old laptop. Surely all of these fancy Tensor processors and thousand dollar phones can do that stuff while they’re charging overnight?

      • bokherif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Money. The latest Pixel devices all have the same processors although the features are locked behind software depending on which model you got.

        • evo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s not entirely true. They may have the same processor but they don’t have the same amount of RAM, which is actually super critical for on device AI tasks. They recently brought all the features to the Pixel 8, but it took additional time to optimize for 8 GB vs the 12 GB of the Pro.