• Akasazh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The argument isn’t about that EVs are bad. The argument is that the Chinese government subsides the manufacture of them, so they can outperform western car companies, in order to capture the market.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      yes, those subsidies are much more important that climate change and there’s no way that we subsidize and bail out our own auto industries and definitely not multiple times with zero strings attached.

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Hey I’m not defending the decision, I’m just clarifying the reason they were put in place.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          they’re not reasons; they’re excuses and parroting them only serves to legitimize those excuses to those who don’t bother to pay attention.

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s not really the point. The important metric is the price of Chinese EVs in Europe compared to EVs from European car makers. That’s why the tarrifs are instated.

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Western governments need to step up their subsidies for green tech then to compete, I guess. Not start banning the people who are providing the solution.

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I do agree with you, unfortunately the climate is always trumped by the business climate.

        On the other hand let’s not hail the Chinese government as being climate minded. Their industry is cheap partly due to climate and worker safety not being regulated as much.