It’s become clear to many that Red Hat’s recent missteps with CentOS and the availability of RHEL source code indicate that it’s fallen from its respected place as “the open organization.” SUSE seems to be poised to benefit from Red Hat’s errors. We connect the dots.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        OpenSUSE isn’t enterprise friendly for a many reasons. It lacks the features of rhel like systems and the simplicity of Debian. It somehow manages to be more complex and confusing than both

        • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          wow you are anti opensuse bullshit is so tiresome, first time I am thinking about blocking someone on lemmy, congrats.

        • bsergay@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          OpenSUSE isn’t enterprise friendly for a many reasons.

          Isn’t SLE targeted towards enterprise anyways?

          It lacks the features of rhel like systems and the simplicity of Debian. It somehow manages to be more complex and confusing than both

          I’m by no means an expert, but I don’t recognize this. Would you be so kind to elaborate?

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Rocky doesn’t support the range or products needed to be “the” enterprise suite.

      Heck you could even go Liberty Linux and have the same bins as Rock but support under SUSE, plus k8s, plus update management, plus security tools, plus k8s multi cluster, plus some ai thing to convince investors you are doing something with it.

      Like, and all that’s great, but honestly still not “enough” all under one roof for some enterprise costumers who are just looking to turn a problem into an expense.