It’s become clear to many that Red Hat’s recent missteps with CentOS and the availability of RHEL source code indicate that it’s fallen from its respected place as “the open organization.” SUSE seems to be poised to benefit from Red Hat’s errors. We connect the dots.

  • Ananace@lemmy.ananace.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    To be fair, OpenSUSE is the only project with a name like that, so it makes some sense that they’d want it changed.
    There’s no OpenRedHat, no OpenNovell, no OpenLinspire, etc.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      OpenLinux OpenUnix

      OpenTF, briefly.

      I think OpenNovell was a thing too.

      Thing is, ‘Open-’ was the prefix for a LOT of derivations about 20 years ago. I’m surprised you’ve never heard of any.

      • Ananace@lemmy.ananace.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not at all what my point was. There’s indeed plenty of Open-something (or Libre-something) projects under the sun, but no free/open spins of commercial projects named simply “Open<Trademarked company name / commercial offering>”.

        • digdilem@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Definitely getting into pedantry now, sorry - but OpenSuse isn’t strictly a free version of Suse. Like RHEL, there are some proprietary and commercially restricted software in Suse that doesn’t reappear - verbatim - in OpenSuse.

      • psvrh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago
        • OpenLook
        • OpenMotif
        • OpenTransport on MacOS
        • SCO OpenServer
        • HP OpenMail
        • HP OpenView

        You couldn’t throw a ball without hitting something branded as “Open” in that era.