Archived copies of the article:

The key thing here is that the less overshoot the better, and the amount of overshoot we can afford is small.

    • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      No one with any political power is even remotely trying to prevent that. Maybe we can have a huge war that kills billions to slow the rate of ascent. It is the most likely path that actually results in a timely emissions reduction that is politically tenable (see Iran v. Israel and Pakistan v. India for potential starting points, Ukraine v. Russia could escalate too, I suppose).

      More likely, the climate will start killing us in greater quantities (famines, floods, hurricanes, droughts) resulting in an emission reduction. Eventually, it is a self correcting problem, but that most likely outcome maximizes suffering.

      • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Well Iran vs Israel is already happening and escalating into probably a forever war but I doubt war will help climate change War itself also causes a fuck ton of emissions and environmental damage

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Xi seems to be putting China on a decarbonization trajectory. Not as fast as we need, but one that’s meaningful