Original question by @[email protected]

The storage and processing power of modern smartphones are touted to rival those of a typical laptop. Yet, my trash-picked testing system from over a decade ago with a bottom-of-the-barrel SATA SSD can still boot to the Linux desktop faster than all but one of my Android devices.

Understandably, this isn’t a huge priority since very few people are cold booting their phones every morning. But is it just plain unoptimized? How hard would it be to optimize? Do security features and checks bog it down? Is it that there’s many tiny files to load when booting? What gives?

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think we need better/standardized metrics to make any statement about Android being slow to boot.

    From personal experience, it boots faster than any computer I own.

    Then again, most apps on Android register for a bunch of receivers, many for “on boot” so do whatever they do for that broadcast. (Yet another reason I run rooted, to disable those receivers and keep rarely used apps hibernated).

    • Goretantath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      My motorola takes longer than my pc from over 6 years ago that runs win10. It has this shitty lenovo thinkprotect logo that has to load after a long pulsing bullshit.