Stamets@lemmy.world to RPGMemes @ttrpg.network · 2 days agoNo. You will, however, have funlemmy.worldimagemessage-square19linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageNo. You will, however, have funlemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to RPGMemes @ttrpg.network · 2 days agomessage-square19linkfedilink
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 days agohaha joke’s on you, we’re playing pathfinder, so nothing is op! (do not talk to me about wrestling i have an allergy to them)
minus-squareSolOrion@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 days agoPF2E? I’ve only played PF1E and you can definitely make some broken stuff, but that’s kinda the fun part of PF1E. If you take fucking sacred geometry you suck, though. And nobody wants to get out the flow chart for grappling.
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 day agoyeah pf2e basically they made a really solid game, and grapling is the most broken thing (it’s not very broken)
haha joke’s on you, we’re playing pathfinder, so nothing is op! (do not talk to me about wrestling i have an allergy to them)
PF2E?
I’ve only played PF1E and you can definitely make some broken stuff, but that’s kinda the fun part of PF1E. If you take fucking sacred geometry you suck, though. And nobody wants to get out the flow chart for grappling.
yeah pf2e
basically they made a really solid game, and grapling is the most broken thing (it’s not very broken)