• EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      or itcould take several hours

      only if you have a shitty computer full of garbage. My windows updates only take 2 minutes or less. even feature updates only take about 4 minutes to reboot.

      Windows is only shitty if you don’t know how to use it. Just because you know what the buttons do doesn’t mean you know how to use it.

          • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            You have to cut Microsoft some slack on mandatory updates. They’re still traumatized from the XP era when they were the platform of choice for botnets and “Windows security” was a laughing stock.

            • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Tbh, if Linux had the same user base as windows had back then a large amount of people would postpone any update indefinitely and we’d be in the same shit.

              • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Yeah it’s a different game when your user base is tech savvy and self-selecting. When you have to deal with a billion non-technical people you have to be a lot more protective.

                But even so Linux seems miles ahead. It’s Microsoft who should be the most motivated to add things like AppArmor, Flatpak, immutable system, curated app repos, executable as a filesystem attribute etc. They’re doing none of that, they plateaued at UAC and bundling their own antivirus.

                • dan@upvote.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  executable as a filesystem attribute

                  This already exists. It’s labeled as “Traverse folder / execute file” in the UI.

                  NTFS permissions are also more powerful than the default Linux permission system. Instead of just being able to define permissions for a single user and single group, you can define them for an arbitrary number of users and groups.

                  I say “default Linux permission system” because you can actually use ACLs on Linux (getfacl and setfacl commands), they’re just not used by default. They used to be common in businesses and schools, but these days everyone seems to store their files “in the cloud” and the permissions are managed there instead.

                  curated app repos

                  This is what the Windows store is supposed to be. There’s also WinGet, but I’m not sure if it’s curated.

                  • the_doktor@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    NTFS permissions are just needlessly complicated and convoluted and create more problems than they solve for desktop use. They’re more for server use, but then again, so are ACLs on Linux. If Windows would just use simple permissions like Linux does, it’d be a hell of a lot better.

                    The Windows store is also a sandboxed, heavily restricted pile of trash you can’t even get at for most of its apps. And Winget has so many issues from its install scripts not working right to just being outright broken that it’s not worth using. Even flatpak installs can be easily modified and used normally.

                    The excuses for using obsolete Windows continues by its paid shills and brainwashed users. Give it up.