In overturning a Court of Appeals decision, the state’s high court examined whether or not a woman simply exposing her breasts constitutes conduct of a sexual nature.
Fun fact: they once dressed up some female rats in ‘slutty’ clothes and make up and the male rats preferred that to other female rats that were ‘au naturel’. You’d think a species with no concept of a nudity taboo wouldn’t notice this, but apparently that happened.
Point is: accentuated or ‘decorated’ nudity would be sexier than just simple nudity.
The boys’ first sexual experience was with a girl in a vest, so they sought more of what they knew they enjoyed. It’s not that certain clothing is inherently sexual, but that the sex/clothing association is learned.
Been to topless beaches, naked boobs honestly are less attractive to the eye then boobs in a bikini top.
Sexual clothing ends up being like 80% of the reason my eye is drawn to tits most of the time.
Fun fact: they once dressed up some female rats in ‘slutty’ clothes and make up and the male rats preferred that to other female rats that were ‘au naturel’. You’d think a species with no concept of a nudity taboo wouldn’t notice this, but apparently that happened.
Point is: accentuated or ‘decorated’ nudity would be sexier than just simple nudity.
The boys’ first sexual experience was with a girl in a vest, so they sought more of what they knew they enjoyed. It’s not that certain clothing is inherently sexual, but that the sex/clothing association is learned.
Which makes me what made those male rats gravitate towards the female rats in makeup and a microskirt thingie…
What does this mean?
They’re referring to a study regarding learned associations with sexual arousal:
https://www.livescience.com/48980-rats-sexual-attraction-lingerie.html