• tiredofsametab@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It depends upon the definition of “on”, I suppose.

    If jumping or falling count as not being “on” earth, the fact is not true since there is (a) almost no chance with so many people that one person (probably a child) somewhere wasn’t jumping or falling and (b) we can’t definitively prove things one way or the other with regard to (a).

    If we do say “OK, human-body-powered times not in contact with earth don’t count” (assuming the human is responsible here for cases where they fall, for simplicity), we would have to move on to vehicles. Driving a vehicle that contacts the ground seems pretty “on earth”. I suppose boats would as well. What about planes, thought? They’re definitely “in the air” when they’re not “on the ground” (I’m sticking with English here since the post is in English; we could open another can of words worms for other languages).

    So next we have to say “things flying in the atmosphere don’t count” then we have to either define atmosphere or define an arbitrary line of Xkm above the average surface of earth. In the case of the former, how much atmosphere counts as atmosphere?

    I guess we could move on to gravity well after that.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      define atmosphere or define an arbitrary line of Xkm above the average surface of earth.

      100km. Atmosphere is a gradient so yes it’s entirely arbitrary.

      • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If a person fell into the singularity of a black hole that had particles from our atmosphere, are we back to on earth again? (My vote is “s/he dead and no even if not”, but I think it’s interesting to think about).